I Made a Newspaper AI Image Prompt
Make the research results on {argument name="topic" default="ChatGPT 5.5"} look like a 'children's newspaper' made by a preschooler. Use colored pencils and lead pencils on white paper. It should be a crude, child-made newspaper. Center a poorly drawn picture that tried to copy an original image. Do not make it clean, good, cute, tidy, or a skillful child-style illustration. Make it look like a truly bad drawing by a kindergartner. The title should be child-written, e.g., '{argument name="title" default="I Made a Newspaper"}', 'I worked hard on this', or 'This is an important drawing'. Text mostly in hiragana, with inconsistent letter sizes, not aligned straight, slightly tilted, some letters too big or too small. Inside, have poorly written headings like '{argument name="heading" default="I wrote this part"}', 'This part was hard', 'I colored it in', 'I made a small mistake', or 'But I did my best'. Lines wiggly, boxes not straight, circles weird ovals, arrows pointing strangely. The attempt to mimic an original image failed badly: shapes improper, sizes inconsistent, large parts too big, small parts too small, eyes/mouths/bodies slightly misplaced, colors bleeding out of lines, uncolored spots, some areas heavily colored others lightly, visible marks from scrubbing. In a corner, small poorly drawn pictures (sun, star, flower, heart, weird face, unidentifiable circles). Do not make it clean, organized, or professional-looking. Do not make it resemble a real newspaper or well-done classroom newsletter. Make it look like a child showing it and saying 'I made this into a newspaper!' or 'Look, I finished it!'. It is quite bad in writing, drawing, and boxes, but the child worked hard. Background is plain white paper. Let it be as is.
Content: Structure: subject (research on a topic), scene (children's newspaper), style (preschooler hand-drawn, colored & lead pencils on white paper), composition (poor center drawing, small corner doodles), color (bleeding, uneven, patchy), texture (pencil marks).
Pros: Effectively prompts model to generate very crude, childlike style; rich details guide output strongly.
Cons: Overly specific demands may be hard for model to fully satisfy; conflicting instructions (e.g., 'not cute' vs 'add hearts') may reduce coherence.
Reference image: No obvious reference-image dependency
Source materials are collected from publicly accessible web pages. Contact us if a rights issue needs review. Copyright & Privacy
