Back 中文 CC Prompt Galaxy
Task Objective: Generate a set of 16 chat-style sticker emojis based on the reference images. The result shou… - AI prompt reference from CC Prompt Galaxy

16 chat stickers in MS Paint doodle style AI Image Prompt

Prompt

Generate a set of 16 chat-style sticker emojis based on the reference images. The result should feel expressive, highly shareable, and stylistically unified — but intentionally chaotic, low-quality, and humorous. The final output should look like: Someone who cannot draw, using a mouse in MS Paint, randomly doodling and writing text at the same time — messy, awkward, low-effort, but unexpectedly funny. Character Usage Rules: Identify all possible subjects in Image 1 (people, animals, etc.). Each subject can act as a main character. Different stickers can feature different characters. Some stickers may include multiple characters interacting. Distribution should feel natural and context-driven. Consistency Definition (Critical Redefinition): This task prioritizes “consistent imperfection”, NOT realistic consistency. The same character across stickers does NOT need to look identical, but must feel like it was drawn by the same unskilled person. Must be consistent in drawing behavior, simplification logic, error patterns (crooked proportions, shaky lines), and overall messiness level. Allowed: facial distortion, proportion inconsistency, structural errors, missing details. Must retain minimal recognizable traits (e.g., silhouette, color, signature features). Consistency = “wrong in the same way”, not “accurate likeness”. Layout & Structure: 16 stickers total, arranged in a 4x4 grid. Each sticker is an independent frame. Can feature single or multiple characters. Individual frames can be messy. Overall grid must remain clear and readable. Text System (Core Expression Layer): User provides multiple lines of text. Quantity handling: if fewer than 16, automatically complete to 16; if more than 16, select the most expressive 16. Language rule: use the same language as the user input. Do NOT enforce any specific language. Completion rules: maintain tone consistency (sarcastic, lazy, emotional, clingy, absurd, etc.), prefer internet-style expressions, short phrases preferred but longer lines allowed, avoid repetition. Expression goals: instantly understandable, emotionally strong, feels like real meme text. Tone priority: complaints, self-talk, emotional bursts, indifference/annoyance/absurd humor. Avoid: polite responses, formal or structured phrasing. Text-Image Integration (Critical): Text must be DRAWN, not typeset. Must look like mouse handwriting (crooked, shaky, uneven size), be messy (tilted, overlapping, misaligned), have inconsistent spacing, be placed freely (on face, beside, edges, etc.). Allowed: repeated letters (aaaaa), stretched words (soooo tired), random punctuation (????!!!), messy or ugly writing. Must remain readable and not block understanding. Expression Generation Mechanism (Most Important): Simulate the process: “A person who cannot draw, using a mouse, doodling randomly while writing text at the same time.” Key rules: image and text must come from the SAME moment. Not: draw first, then add text. But: draw and write simultaneously. Each sticker should feel like a random doodle then spontaneous writing, or both happening together. Should feel unplanned, careless, immediate. Text-Image Relationship: Text and visuals should form commentary, emotional amplification, self-talk, or slightly mismatched humor. Allowed: loose or imperfect alignment, absurd or off-topic humor. Goal: not accuracy, but humor. Aesthetic DNA (Core Style Driver): Style origin: terrible MS Paint doodles + failed imitation + extremely low drawing skill. Visual traits: shaky, unstable, jagged lines; bad proportions; stick figures or crude shapes; minimal or no details; pixelated, rough edges; frames can be messy but grid must stay readable; emotion: awkward, direct, absurd, funny; resemblance only vaguely resembles the original, like a failed copy. Style Enforcement (Critical): When conflict occurs between realism and style, ALWAYS choose style. Allowed to break detail, proportion, accuracy, cleanliness. Strictly forbid clean lines, correct anatomy, polished visuals, designed aesthetics. Rule: if it looks “good”, it is WRONG. Force it back to messy, ugly, low-effort. Anti-Template & Randomization System (Critical): Strictly forbid numbering (1, 2, 3…), list-style output, sequential planning. Must treat all 16 stickers as “16 independent, random expressions”. Randomness requirements: vary text length, tone and emotion; some complete, some fragmented; some minimal or almost empty. Avoid repetition, predictable phrasing, common default responses. Allow abrupt or weird expressions, uneven density, inconsistent structure. Generation method: Do NOT plan all 16. Instead simulate “16 separate spontaneous moments”. Must include emotional fluctuation, instability, randomness. Anti-reuse rule: each generation must avoid repeating previous outputs, avoid fixed patterns, feel freshly created. Sticker Requirements: Each sticker visually distinct, clear emotional signal, usable in chat, strong expressive power. Final Goal: Generate 16 stickers. The result must feel like “A person who cannot draw used a mouse to doodle 16 times, randomly writing emotional thoughts each time — messy, inconsistent, but unexpectedly funny.” NOT “A clean, well-designed AI sticker set”.

AI Image Content Analysis

Content: Structure: Based on reference images, centered on characters, generate 16 independent stickers (4×4 grid) with handwritten text. Key elements: subject (identify characters from reference), scene (none fixed), style (MS Paint doodle, low-quality, humorous), composition (each sticker independent, grid overall clear), lighting/color/material (not specified), lens (none), proportion (crooked allowed). 'Consistent imperfection' defines character consistency.

Pros: 1. Clear style definition, enforcing 'consistent imperfection' to avoid accurate copying while preserving fun. 2. Simultaneous text and image generation, emphasizing improvisation of 'unskilled drawer'.

Cons: 1. Dependent on reference images; may struggle without suitable input. 2. Overly complex rules may limit AI's randomness.

Reference image: 明显的参考图依赖 (reference images, Image 1)/明显的参考图依赖 (reference images, Image 1)

Author
小小东
Type
Image
Aspect ratio
1:1
Size
1200 × 1200
Added
2026-06-04

Source materials are collected from publicly accessible web pages. Contact us if a rights issue needs review. Copyright & Privacy